Tools4U.Click
No Login No Fees Free Forever

Wells' Criteria for Pulmonary Embolism Calculator

This interactive clinical decision tool calculates the pretest probability of pulmonary embolism (PE) using the validated Wells' Criteria. Results update automatically as you select criteria.

Wells' Criteria Calculator

Select all criteria that apply to the patient. Results update instantly:

Clinical Symptoms
Risk Factors
Additional Criteria
Malignancy
Results update automatically as you make selections

Results

0
PE Unlikely
Total Wells' Score

Pulmonary Embolism Probability

Low Risk
<2 points
Moderate Risk
2-6 points
High Risk
>6 points
1.3% PE incidence
16.2% PE incidence
37.5% PE incidence
Current Score

Select criteria to see detailed results and management recommendations.

Management Recommendations

Based on the Wells' Criteria score, the following diagnostic pathways are recommended:

Three-Tier Model: Low Risk (<2 points)

Approximately 1.3% incidence of PE
  • Consider d-dimer testing to rule out pulmonary embolism
  • Alternatively consider a rule-out criteria such as PERC
  • If d-dimer is negative, consider stopping workup
  • If d-dimer is positive, consider CTA (CT pulmonary angiography)

Three-Tier Model: Moderate Risk (2-6 points)

Approximately 16.2% incidence of PE
  • Consider high sensitivity d-dimer testing or CTA
  • If d-dimer is negative, consider stopping workup
  • If d-dimer is positive, consider CTA
  • Age-adjusted d-dimer cutoffs for patients >50 years: Age (years) Γ— 10 Β΅g/L

Three-Tier Model: High Risk (>6 points)

Approximately 37.5% incidence of PE
  • Consider CTA (CT pulmonary angiography)
  • D-dimer testing is not recommended for high-risk patients
  • Given high sensitivity but low specificity (~50%) of d-dimer, high-risk patients should be ruled out with CTA

Two-Tier Model Alternative

PE Unlikely (0-4 points, 12.1% incidence): Consider high sensitivity d-dimer testing. If negative, stop workup. If positive, consider CTA.

PE Likely (>4 points, 37.1% incidence): Consider CTA testing. D-dimer testing is not recommended.

Detailed Medical Advice

Clinical Considerations

  • β€’ Some advocate using the Wells' score over clinician gestalt to predict who is low-risk and then applying the PERC rule to stop workup for PE.
  • β€’ As with all clinical decision aids, the physician must first have a suspicion of the diagnosis before attempting to apply the Wells criteria.
  • β€’ The original intent of this tool was to determine who was low risk enough to rule out testing with a d-dimer.

Critical Actions

  • β€’ Never delay resuscitative efforts for diagnostic testing, especially in the unstable patient.
  • β€’ History and exam should always be performed prior to diagnostic testing.
  • β€’ Guidelines appear to favor the two-tier model which utilizes only the high sensitivity d-dimer and more conservative risk stratification.
  • β€’ "Intermediate" risk patients are thought to be still too high risk to be evaluated without further risk stratification.

How to Use This Tool

Follow these steps to effectively use the Wells' Criteria Calculator:

1

Assess Patient

Evaluate the patient with suspected pulmonary embolism based on clinical presentation and history.

2

Select Criteria

Click on all criteria that apply to the patient using the side-by-side selection buttons.

3

Review Results

Results update automatically as you make selections. Examine risk classification, visualization, and management recommendations.

4

Download Report

Generate a PDF report with results for medical records or consultation purposes.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Wells' Criteria for Pulmonary Embolism? +

Wells' Criteria is a clinical prediction rule that estimates the pretest probability of pulmonary embolism (PE) in patients with suspected PE based on clinical findings. It was developed to help clinicians determine which patients should undergo further diagnostic testing for PE.

What score indicates high probability of pulmonary embolism? +

In the traditional three-tier model, a score >6 indicates high probability of PE (approximately 37.5% incidence). In the two-tier model, a score >4 indicates 'PE Likely' (approximately 37.1% incidence).

Can this calculator replace clinical judgment? +

No, this calculator is a clinical decision aid and should not replace clinical judgment. Physicians must first have suspicion of PE before applying the Wells criteria. The tool is designed to supplement, not replace, clinical evaluation and judgment.

What is the difference between the three-tier and two-tier models? +

The three-tier model classifies patients as low (<2 points), moderate (2-6 points), or high (>6 points) risk. The two-tier model classifies patients as "PE Unlikely" (0-4 points) or "PE Likely" (>4 points). Guidelines tend to favor the two-tier model for its simplicity and conservative risk stratification.

How should age affect d-dimer interpretation? +

Age-adjusted d-dimer cutoffs have been validated for use in patients over 50 years in low risk patients. The formula is: Age (years) Γ— 10 Β΅g/L = cutoff. This adjustment increases the specificity of d-dimer testing in older patients while maintaining sensitivity.

References & Sources

This calculator is based on the following evidence-based sources:

Additional Resources

For further information, consult these trusted medical resources: